[Dirvish] performance issues with dirvish

Dominik Schulz lkml at ds.gauner.org
Wed Feb 18 16:22:22 UTC 2009


Am Dienstag 17 Februar 2009 23:58:21 schrieb Shawn (Red Mop):
> We took a look at dirvish over NFS back in May (link below), and came to
> the conclusion that you should not store your vaults on NFS unless you
> must.  It is definately preferable to use rsync over ssh to transfer your
> data.  The very last post (also linked) mentioned some settings that helped
> speed things up a bit, but it is a work around.  If you can have the
> machine with the dirvish vaults run the backup itself (you only need ssh,
> perl, and rsync).
If you manage to use ssh it may additionally help to use the "-carcfour" 
option (rsh: ssh -carcfour) if you are on a secure network.

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Dominik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://www.dirvish.org/pipermail/dirvish/attachments/20090218/166c907f/attachment.bin 


More information about the Dirvish mailing list