[Dirvish] Dirvish speed and security

[Leopold Palomo Avellaneda]

A Dijous 29 Maig 2008, Shawn (Red Mop) va escriure:
> On Thursday 29 May 2008 02:56:56 am Dave Howorth wrote:
> > Shawn (Red Mop) wrote:
> > > This also suggests making your rsize/wsize smaller...
> > > http://osdir.com/ml/nfs/2003-03/msg00119.html
> >
> > I think that's past its sell-by date :) AFAIK, current NFS uses TCP by
> > default and the rsize and wsize are optimal as Leopold has them in most
> > circumstances. So I'd do careful performance checking of any changes!
> >
> > But improving network performance definitely seems to be the first
> > priority.
>
> Well, that puts me out of ideas.  I'm not an nfs guru by any means.  I
> mainly just use it for /usr/portage/distfiles.
>
> How did the backup go last night?

Sorry for the delay. Today was not a good day... anyway,

better, much better:

Number of files: 1161747
Number of files transferred: 1777
Total file size: 132295386008 bytes
Total transferred file size: 1925258471 bytes
Literal data: 1925258471 bytes
Matched data: 0 bytes
File list size: 25969262
File list generation time: 1148.268 seconds
File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds
Total bytes sent: 1952512709
Total bytes received: 1009728

sent 1952512709 bytes  received 1009728 bytes  72760.95 bytes/sec
total size is 132295386008  speedup is 67.72

Now, I should think about create a binary of rsync for that box and then 
compare. 

Thanks to all for all, specially to Shawn (Red Mop) for the interest.
When I got some news I promise that I will write to the list.

Best regards,

Leo

-- 
--
Linux User 152692
PGP: 0xF944807E
Catalonia
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://www.dirvish.org/pipermail/dirvish/attachments/20080530/763f8348/attachment.bin