[Dirvish] dirvish: no incremental on Mac OS 10.4
haug at berndhaug.net
Thu Oct 26 09:23:53 PDT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Wed 25 Oct 2006, Bernd Haug wrote:
>> What kind of associations do you mean? Date and contents stay the
>> same; and inode isn't the same (or rather, may or may not be the
>> same) on any Unix.
> Again, the resource forks...
Well, if dirvish does not use ressource forks, why should it notice
>> I don't care so much about resource forks; I want the data to be
>> correct and in incremental backups; the Mac-specific Metadata isn't
>> important to me.
> A workaround may be to replace the OS/X rsync by a "generic" rsync that
> ignores the resource forks in that case. Rename the supplied rsync to
> iRsync or so :-)
Mine should do just that, see below.
Also, does local transport even use rsync?
>> BTW, to reiterate: There are Macs on both ends (basically, there is
>> only one end; local disk), and I've tried local transport too, which
>> breaks in the same way, only faster.
> Perhaps some special option needs to be passed to rsync to transfer the
> resource forks then? I've heard of -E , but I'm not sure. Add that to
> the dirvish rsync options via:
> in your master.conf.
Neither the rsync in Fink for 10.4 (/sw/bin/rsync, just installed
it) nor the rsync in /usr/bin/rsync (I used that so far) documents -E.
Yours, Bernd Haug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Dirvish