[Dirvish] [patch] local to remote backup; dirvish push

[Dave Howorth]

Robert Siemer wrote:
> My patch addresses:
> 
>     * calls rsync with a relative --link-dest path instead of an
> 	absolute one (as my first patch got no response I include this
> 	funtionality here again)
>     * adapts the 'bank:' option to enable the naming of two points to
> 	access the remote bank (a local and the remote representation).
> 
> Further information at http://backsla.sh/backup
> 
> Comments?

I guess the reason I didn't comment on the previous patch is that it 
seems worthy but I don't actually need it right now! With a backup 
system like dirvish, my overriding concern is that it keeps working 
reliably. As a result, I'm extra conservative about changes.

So I just read the previous patch and checked I couldn't see any obvious 
way it would break the way I use dirvish, if it did get adopted.

One obvious thing I'd be keen to see is a set of tests for the patch.

Cheers, Dave