[Dirvish] Bank on the remote side?

[Robert Siemer]

Anybody out there?


Robert

On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 03:46:32PM +0200, Robert Siemer wrote:
> Hello again!
> 
> Is there a way to turn the tables and let a bank be on the remote end?
> It would be perfectly fine to _just_ do the "tree bulk" transfer over
> rsync. I imagine to sshfs mount the remote bank, but instead of a copy
> from local to bank (high load on sshfs) or rsync from local to bank
> (also high load on sshfs) I need a rsync from local (client) to remote
> (bank).
> 
> Basically:
> 
> 1) two locations for the bank a) the sshfs mounted name for the
>    management stuff and b) the user at client:/path for the bulk transfer.
> 2) Everything like normal, but force an rsync (not a local copy) and
>    switch the two arguments for the rsync call (and use the 1.b) name)
> 
> Anybody following me here? (-: