[Dirvish] Bank on the remote side?

[Robert Siemer]

Hello again!

Is there a way to turn the tables and let a bank be on the remote end?
It would be perfectly fine to _just_ do the "tree bulk" transfer over
rsync. I imagine to sshfs mount the remote bank, but instead of a copy
from local to bank (high load on sshfs) or rsync from local to bank
(also high load on sshfs) I need a rsync from local (client) to remote
(bank).

Basically:

1) two locations for the bank a) the sshfs mounted name for the
   management stuff and b) the user at client:/path for the bulk transfer.
2) Everything like normal, but force an rsync (not a local copy) and
   switch the two arguments for the rsync call (and use the 1.b) name)

Anybody following me here? (-:


Bye,
	Robert

PS: using dirvish on the remote end natively is not an option here.